Corporate law

Paris Court of Economic Affairs (Tribunal des affaires économiques de Paris): entry into force of a new protocol for disputes on the merits

On 19 December 2024, the Bar, the Clerk's Office (greffe) and the Paris Commercial Court signed a new protocol relating to the introduction and scheduling of disputes on the merits, with the aim of reducing the average time taken to process these cases.

The protocol concerns the settlement of disputes on the merits (and not summary proceedings, claims and injunctions to pay) and will apply to new cases filed after its implementation, which is scheduled to take place in stages from 1 January 2025. Firstly, it aims to improve the organisation of the filing of cases by introducing a procedure for the scheduling of dates. As soon as this function is operational on the ‘digital court’, the date will be scheduled on the commercial court platform.

The case will then be placed at the clerk's office by electronic transmission (Word or PDF text format) or, if this is not possible, by filing the copy of the summons with the reservation number at the clerk's office.

The protocol also changes the way in which cases are instructed, where representation by a lawyer is mandatory, based on the provisions of articles 446-1 to 446-4 of the French Code of Civil Procedure. As soon as the case is introduced, the parties will be proposed an amicable way of resolving the dispute. In the absence of conciliation, the court will exempt the parties from attending subsequent pre-trial hearings and, after obtaining the opinion of the parties, it will set a calendar for exchanges depending on the complexity of the case. Subject to certain exceptions, the exchanges will have to take place electronically.

Corporate law

New provisions on amicable liquidation proceedings and transfer of company assets (TUP)

Amicable liquidation and universal transfer of assets (TUP) procedures are sometimes misused by fraudulent companies facing tax and social security reassessments, which they seek to elude.

To prevent such misuse, the decree of 7^th July 2024 makes it compulsory to publish the dissolution giving rise to a TUP procedure in the “Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales” (BODACC) and to produce certificates of social security and tax compliance when closing the amicable liquidation procedure.

As a result, article 8 of decree no. 78-704 is amended to make it compulsory to publish the dissolution giving rise to a TUP procedure only in the BODACC and no longer in a legal gazette, in order to enhance the publicity given to the procedure and the information provided to creditors.

The text also amends article 10 of the same decree and article R. 237-7 of the French Commercial Code (for commercial companies) to make it compulsory to produce a certificate of social regularity and a tax certificate attesting that the accounts are fully updated when the amicable liquidation is closed, as part of this procedure, which takes place without the intervention of a judge. Although the company must not have any debts and must have enough assets to pay all its liabilities, there is no obligation to certify that, a situation that the decree seeks to correct with this new obligation.

These provisions will come into force on 1^st October 2024.

Corporate law

Conditions under which former members of a civil company (société civile) are held liable for the company's debts.

In a recent decision, the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) ruled that shareholders in a civil partnership who have transferred their shares may be held liable for the company's debts that became due and payable before the date of the transfer, without any need to justify unsuccessful legal proceedings against the company prior to that date.

Corporate law

General Meeting of a Société Anonyme: the failure to establish a quorum is not equivalent to a lack of quorum

The Extraordinary General Meeting of a Société Anonyme is deemed valid only if the shareholders present or represented hold at least one-quarter of the shares with voting rights on first call and one-fifth on second call (French Commercial Code, art. L. 225-96, para. 2). Resolutions adopted in breach of this rule are null and void (French Commercial Code, art. L. 225-96, para. 1).

The shareholders of a Société Anonyme requested the nullity of an Extraordinary General Meeting, arguing that the meeting officers had failed to ensure that a quorum was met.

Their claim has been rejected: only the adoption of resolutions by the Extraordinary General Meeting without respecting the quorum can lead to nullity; however, the plaintiffs did not argue that the quorum had not been met, but only that the officers of the meeting had failed to ascertain its presence.  

Corporate law

Alternative arbitration clause and attribution of jurisdiction: the court may be seized

In a recent decision, the Paris Court of Appeal stated that, in the event of an alternative clause providing for recourse to arbitration to settle disputes arising from the contract, while reserving the parties the option of submitting their dispute to the national court in the event of disagreement, the court may be seized to establish the existence of such disagreement.

Corporate law

Commercial agents unable to continue working for health reasons are entitled to indemnification

The In a recent decision, the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) ruled that in the event that a commercial agent terminates his contract for health reasons, he retains his entitlement to the contract termination indemnity, even if he is not completely unable to carry out any activity, as long as he can no longer reasonably pursue his activity as an agent.

Tax

Research tax credit (“crédit d'impôt recherche - CIR”): sub-contracted expenses can only be taken into account if they have been paid during the financial year

According to the Toulouse Administrative Court of Appeal, sub-contracted expenses can only be taken into account in calculating the research tax credit (“crédit d'impôt recherche – CIR”) in respect of a given financial year if they are actually paid in that same year.

Tax

Denial of tax exemption to non-residents is subject to the contradictory procedure

When non-resident contributors claim an exemption on the basis of a bilateral tax treaty in a letter attached to their wealth tax (“Impôt de Solidarité sur la Fortune – ISF”) declaration, the contradictory rectification procedure must be implemented (French Supreme Court 18-9-2024 no. 23-10.515 F-D).

Employment law

The duration of fixed-term contracts, even if discontinuous, is deducted from the trial period provided for in any permanent contract subsequently entered into.

In a recent decision, the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) has reiterated the conditions for the implementation of the trial period in the event of a succession of previous contracts, confirming its case law in this matter.

In particular, on expiry of one or more fixed-term employment contracts (CDD), the employee may be hired, without any delay, on a permanent contract (CDI) by the company in which he or she was working. In this case, the duration of the fixed-term contract(s) has to be deducted from any trial period provided for in the new employment contract (French Labor Code, art. L 1243-11, para. 3), even if the various contracts are separated by short periods of interruption. The deduction of the duration of previous fixed-term contracts from the trial period of the new contract is even more applicable in the event of new recruitment on a fixed-term contract following immediately successive fixed-term contracts. However, except in cases of fraud, the employer does not have to reduce the trial period if the new contract is for a different position requiring the employee to have different qualifications and skills.

Employment law

A recording made without the employer's awareness can be used to prove a work-related accident

The plenary session of the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) recently ruled that, in civil proceedings, the unlawfulness of obtaining or producing evidence does not necessarily mean that it should be excluded from the proceedings. The court must, when requested to do so, assess whether such evidence undermines the fairness of the proceedings as a whole, by balancing the right to evidence against the conflicting rights involved. The right to evidence may justify the production of evidence that undermines other rights, provided that such production is essential to the exercise of that right and that the violation is strictly proportionate to the aim pursued.

In a judgment of 6 June 2024, the Second Civil Chamber of the French Supreme Court applied this solution for the first time to disputes concerning work-related accidents. It approved the Court of Appeal's (Cour d’appel) ruling that an employee could produce an audio recording made without the knowledge of the director of the company with whom he had had an altercation, in order to obtain recognition both of the work-related nature of the accident resulting from this altercation and of the employer's inexcusable fault, after observing that the court had carefully balanced the director's right to respect for his private life and the victim's right to evidence.

Employment law

Repeated sexist comments by an employee are culpable and justify dismissal

An employee who repeatedly insults colleagues using mildly sexist language is guilty of misconduct justifying dismissal, regardless of the employer's past tolerance.

Employment law

No compensation for notice for an employee who refuses a change in working conditions

An employee who refuses a simple change in working conditions may be dismissed for misconduct. In this case, the employer may require that the notice period, if any, be performed under the new working conditions. An employee who refuses loses all entitlement to compensation for notice (French Supreme Court, Labour Division, 23-10-2024 no. 22-22.917 F-D, Association Essor c/ E).

Real estate law

Consequences of an ancient promise to sell: revocation and invalidity of the price

It is impossible for the promisor to withdraw from the unilateral undertaking to sell unless otherwise stipulated in the contract. Whether the price is too low is determined at the date of the unilateral undertaking to sell and not, as in matters of lesion, at the date of exercise of the option.

Real estate law

The seller's right to occupancy compensation is not conditional on absence of fault on his part

While the seller's bad faith does not deprive him of his right to restitution in respect of the occupation of the property sold after the invalidation of the sale, a purchaser acting in good faith only has to pay this value from the date of the claim (French Supreme Court 3^rd Civil Division 5-12-2024 no. 23-16.270 FS-B).

Real estate law

Legal standing for a non-professional creditor in a compulsory sale of the principal residence of a debtor in compulsory liquidation

A creditor with a charge over real property, to whom the declaration of unseizability of a property belonging to a debtor in compulsory liquidation cannot be set up against, may proceed with its sale on seizure. The non-professional creditor's right to bring an action is recognised because it is not an action to order the debtor to pay a sum of money prohibited by article L. 622-21 of the French Commercial Code (French Supreme Court, Commercial Division, 20 November 2024, F-B, no. 23-19.924).

Lisa Alice Julien new Board Member of the Italian Chamber of Commerce for France (CCI France Italie)

We are pleased to share that our Partner, Lawyer in France and in Italy, Lisa Alice Julien, is now Member of the Board the Italian Chamber of Commerce for France (CCI France Italie).

This esteemed role reflects Lisa Alice’s unwavering commitment to fostering strong economic and professional ties between Italy and France.

Her strategic vision and deep expertise will undoubtedly contribute to the continued growth and success of the Chamber, as well as to the strengthening of collaboration between the two countries.

Learn more about the Chamber's governance: https://www.chambre.it/chi-siamo/governance.html

We extend our heartfelt congratulations to Lisa Alice Julien on this significant achievement!

On 12 August, Regulation (EU) 2024/2019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 (the “Regulation”) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union, introducing several substantive and/or procedural amendments to Protocol no. 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the “Statute” and “Court of Justice”).

Below is a summary of the amendments introduced by the Regulation.

1. Granting of preliminary ruling jurisdiction in specific matters to the General Court

The Regulation introduces Article 50-ter conferring jurisdiction on the General Court of the European Union (the “General Court”) to hear and make references for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 of the TFEU falling within one or more of the following matters:

1. the common system of value added tax;
2. excise duties;
3. the Customs Code;
4. the tariff classification of goods in the Combined Nomenclature;
5. compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding or delay or cancellation of transport services; and
6. the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme.

Regarding points (a) to (d), Recital 9 of the Regulation clarifies that “Those area cover, at the time of the adoption of this Regulation, matters such as the determination of the tax base for the assessment of value added tax or the conditions for exemption from payment of that tax; the interpretation of the general arrangements for excise duty and of the framework relating to duties on alcohol, alcoholic beverages, tobacco, energy products and electricity; the elements on the basis of which import or export duties are applied in the context of trade in goods, such as the Common Customs Tariff, the origin and customs value of goods; import and export procedures, including the incurrence, determination and extinction of a customs debt; specific customs arrangements; the system of relief from customs duties as well as the interpretation of specific tariff headings and the criteria for the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature laid down in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2658/87”.

With reference to point (e), recital 10 of the Regulation clarifies that these matters “cover matters that are at the time of the adoption of this Regulation regulated by Regulations (EC) No. 261/2004 [air transport], (EU) No. 1177/2010 [maritime transport], (EU) No. 181/2011 [bus and coach transport] and (EU) 2021/782 [rail transport] of the European Parliament and of the Council”.

With reference to point (f), recital 10 of the Regulation clarifies that this scheme “at the time of the adoption of this Regulation is regulated by Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and by the acts adopted on the basis of that Directive”.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, pursuant to paragraph 2 of the new Article 50-ter, the Court of Justice will retain jurisdiction to hear and make references for preliminary rulings raising “independent questions concerning the interpretation of primary law, public international law, general principles of law or the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union”.

Furthermore, under paragraph 3 of the new provision, references for preliminary rulings under Article 267 must be made to the Court of Justice. The Court – “as soon as possible” and in accordance with the procedures laid down in its Rules of Procedure – will then determine whether the request falls exclusively within the matters under the General Court’s jurisdiction and, if so, will transfer the case to the General Court.

• Participation in the proceedings by the European Parliament, the Council and the European Central Bank

The Regulation amends Article 23 of the Statute to stipulate that, where a matter is referred for a preliminary ruling, the decision of the national court or tribunal to stay the proceedings must be notified by the Registry of the Court. This notification must be made not only to the parties involved, the Member States, the Commission and the Union institution or body or entity that adopted the act whose validity or interpretation is being challenged, as already provided for in Article 23 – but also to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Central Bank.

Under the newly added paragraph 2, if the European Parliament, the Council and the European Central Bank consider that they have “a particular interest in the questions raised by the reference for a preliminary ruling”, they may submit statements of case or written observations within two months of receiving the notification.

Under the new paragraph 3, pleadings or written observations submitted by an interested party will be published on the website of the Court of Justice “within a reasonable time” after the case is closed, unless that interested party objects to the publication of its pleadings or written observations.

• Election of Advocates General to handle references for preliminary rulings assigned to the General Court

The Regulation introduce Article 49-bis of the Statute, establishing that, in the handling of references for a preliminary ruling, the General Court shall be assisted by one or more Advocates General, elected for a term of 3 years – with the possibility of one renewal - from among the Judges of the General Court.

• Establishment of the Intermediate Chamber of the General Court

The Regulation amends Article 50 of the Statute to introduce, with reference to the composition of the General Court, an intermediate chamber positioned between the chambers composed of five judges and the Grand Chamber.

According to the wording of the new Article 50, the General Court may convene in: (a) chambers of three or five judges; (b) an intermediate chamber; and (c) the grand chamber. In addition, consistent with the existing provisions, the General Court may in some cases make decisions by a single judge.

The new provision provides that, in proceedings relating to a matter referred for a preliminary ruling, the General Court will convene in an intermediate chamber at the request of a Member State or an institution of the Union involved in the case.

• Referral of cases to the Court of Justice or the General Court for preliminary rulings

The Regulation amend Article 50 of the Statute to establish, in line with the provisions regarding the handling of cases:

• if the General Court determines that it lacks jurisdiction to hear a reference for a preliminary ruling, it shall refer the case to the Court of Justice;
• if the Court of Justice finds that it lacks jurisdiction to hear a reference for a preliminary ruling, it must refer the case back to the General Court, which cannot refuse jurisdiction in such instances.

In connection with the above-mentioned referral mechanism, recital 18 of the Rules of Procedure further clarifies that “the General Court may, pursuant to Article 256(3), second subparagraph, TFEU, refer to the Court of Justice a case that falls within its jurisdiction but requires a decision of principle likely to affect the unity or consistency of Union law”.

• Expansion of the procedure for the prior admission of appeals

The Regulation revises Article 58a to broaden the scope of the procedure for prior admission of appeals by the Court of Justice. This expansion includes:

• appeals against a decision of the General Court regarding the decision of an independent Board of Appeals of a body or entity of the Union which, as of 1 May 2019, had such a Board of Appeals but was not expressly covered by the previous version of Article 58a.

These Union bodies/entities include: (a) the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators; (b) the Single Resolution Board; (c) the European Banking Authority; (d) the European Securities and Markets Authority; (e) the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority; and (f) the European Union Railway Agency; and

• litigation concerning the enforcement of contracts containing an arbitration clause.

• Introduction of the consultation procedure for applications or proposals to amend the Statutes

The Regulation introduces Article 62-quinquies which mandates that before submitting an application or a proposal to amend the Statute, the Court of Justice or, where appropriate, the Commission must first conduct “extensive consultations”.

*

The Regulation will enter into force on 1 September 2024 and includes a transitional arrangement as follows:

- any references for preliminary rulings pending before the Court of Justice on 1 October 2024 will in any event continue to be handled by the Court of Justice itself;

- appeals concerning:

(i) decisions of the General Court relating to a decision of a Board of Appeals of one of the bodies/entities of the Union listed in points (a) to (e) of paragraph 6 above; and

(ii) decisions concerning the enforcement of a contract containing an arbitration clause

that are before the Court of Justice on 1 September 2024 shall not be subject to the aforementioned procedure of prior admission of appeals.